Showing posts with label post-apocalypse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label post-apocalypse. Show all posts

Monday, May 10, 2021

"We love you, Joel" - Love and Monsters and the optimistic post-apocalypse

 Often the post-apocalypse as a genre is very dark and gritty and has a pessimistic view of humanity. Anyone to have survived the wasteland this long, goes the argument, is necessarily gruff and hardened at best and a sadistic monster at worst. The main character do not only have to fight whatever the post-apocalyse left them with but also - and often even primarily - other people who would want to harm them. Survival is for the strong in these cases, fearlessness and the willingness to do violence are valued. 

A post-apocalyptic movie like this does not have to be derivative or devoid of meaning. Mad Max: Fury Road, which presents us with just such a world, deals with the post-apocalyptic staples in a much more nuanced way and offers up a narrative that instead focuses on rediscovering kindness and remaking a tyrannical rule (see also the Hopepunk post). All I am saying is that often stories in this genre feel too pessimistic and hopeless.

Love and Monsters does not.

Movie poster of the film "Love and Monsters". It features an ensemble of characters as well as the title and the actor's name "Dylan O'Brien".
Spoilers for the movie!
 

In it, the world is plagued by giant reptiles, anarchids, insects, and amphibians that mutated from radiation after Earth successfully shot down a meteor about to destroy it. The humans that survive live in colonies in various bunkers and bunker-like structures, trying their hardest to make it. Joel (Dylan O'Brien), the main character, one day starts a journey of 140 miles to get to his girlfriend in another colony (Jessica Henwick) because he feels useless in his own. He is, to put it mildly, not really equipped to handle the trip and only makes it through sheer determination, dumb luck, and the help of strangers and a very good dog. 

There is a lot to like about the movie. For example, its creature design is extraordinary, the monsters look alive, otherworldly, scary and at times strangely endearing. Then, the 'love story' that is the catalyst for this whole movie is handled refreshingly realistic. While Joel hangs onto the idea of Amy and what they had five years ago, Amy moved on in the time when they did not hear from each other. She still cares for him and what they were but what they were is in the past for her. She, reasonably, never expects him to actually attempt the trip to her and when he arrives she is overjoyed to see him but she is a different person than she was before the apocalypse. And the movie does not treat her behavior as wrong or bad or condemnable at all, nor does it treat Joel's devotion and drive as silly. Both are valid reactions to dealing with the trauma of surviving the apocalypse. Both characters are sympathetic and right

What I want to elaborate on, however, is the fact that Love and Monsters is so beautifully optimistic in tone that it made me tear up. The emotional arc in this movie centers around Joel believing himself to be the fifth wheel in his colony so to speak. Everyone else is paired up and his contributions are weak at best. He surmises that it won't be a great loss to them if he leaves and decides to go. However, from even before he leaves, it is clear that his colony loves him, they tell him so and attempt to convince him to stay. Joel plays this off as them just trying to be nice until the point where he arrives in his sweetheart's colony and finds things different than he expected. He pulls out a map they gave him and discovers that they wrote encouraging and love-filled messages on the back, boiling down to 'we love you, stay safe, come back to us'. When he manages to reach them over radio, they are ecstatic to discover that he's alive and positively shower him in affection. Joel realizes that he is loved and that he has a family who believe he is worth it, no matter what he might think. It allows him to free himself from the past and look to the future and just makes me very emotional. 

Another aspect is that every person - barring three human antagonists at the end - is kind and helpful and welcoming. The strangers that save his life during his journey, travel with him, teach him how to shoot and what they know about the creatures, attempt to convince him to join them on their search for a safe place and give him gifts to help him survive. Amy's colony not only saves him when he is passed out from venom but is also immediately willing and ready to take him in. Even in the flashback scene detailing Joel's escape from his hometown when he is standing frozen on the street, people in a truck driving by, stop the car to pick him up. Yes, people can be bad and selfish but mostly people are kind and trustworthy and community-oriented. And that's just refreshing to see in a post-apocalypse.

Lastly, I want to talk about the general tone of the movie. Because even though it is tense sometimes, its tone is generally light. The fact that Joel's drive is pure and he is friendly if naive, the people he meets are nice and in the one case where they aren't, at least the monster is. Joel grows during his journey, into himself and away from the past. While the colonies become less and less safe as time goes on, he discovers that it is not impossible to survive outside a bunker and he brings that message to desperate people. First on foot to Amy's colony and his own, then via radio to people sequestered all over the country, who start on their own journey. A journey that the movie presents through framing and score as perilous but hopeful. 

All in all, Love and Monsters is enjoyable and engaging, because it asks 'what if a post-apocalyptic world wasn't just all terror, gloom and desaturation?'. It looks at human behavior and decides that mostly, humans would help and love and support each other in the face of grave danger. It takes a genre widely known for its pessimissm and chooses differently.

It's on Netflix. Give it a watch!

Satori over and out

Tuesday, August 20, 2019

Who is responsible for the apocalypse?

In post-apocalyptic fiction there’s always a reason for how the wastelands came to be. These reasons aren’t always obvious for the characters and maybe even the audience won’t know for sure what actually happened. Sometimes it might even make the scenario more threatening when the audience doesn’t know what exactly caused the apocalypse. The creators of these stories, however, have to know who or what is responsible, otherwise their vision might be inconsistent.

In the following I will present 5 theories about who or what caused the apocalypse, complete with the associated characteristics (it is important to keep in mind that this ‘apocalypse’ I will be talking about, is always a human apocalypse, the definition of ‘post-apocalyptic’ here means ‘after the destruction of human civilization’):

Source: imdb
1. a virus

- examples: most of the zombie apocalypses, 28 Days Later, Planet of the Apes, Maze Runner, Oryx and Crake

- characteristics: The apocalypse didn’t come suddenly and instead was accompanied by a continuous demise of civilization that the characters suffered through. There were and still are efforts to find a cure. Remnants of the civilization breakdown are everywhere as well as the infected. The infected typically are a grave danger and represent some form of corrupted humanity.



Source: filmstarts.de
2. nature

- examples: Hell, 2012

- characteristics: This genre could also be called ‘nature strikes back’. Movies like this often - though not always - have ecological backgrounds. Fact is, a natural disaster destroyed the world as we know it, be it solar flares (like in Hell), or the turning of poles (like in 2012 - even though this is an apocalyptic movie and does not deal with the ‘post’). The world has now become hostile to humans but not to nature per se. In fact, the longer this ‘post’ continues, the more nature can be seen thriving. This is, often, to show - drastically - humanity’s influence on the planet.

Source: filmstarts.de

3. humans/war

- examples: The 100, Fallout, Mad Max

- characteristics: Humans are a very popular trigger of the apocalypse due to the genre’s preoccupation with criticizing current societal developments. Technically ‘a virus’ as well as ‘machines’ are often subclasses of ‘humans’ since humans often were the ones to design the virus and machines in question (technically even nature-apocalypses are sometimes facilitated by human negligence and/or direct influence like in Snowpiercer). What I mean here, however, is the destruction of the world through human war, often nuclear war. Nature is either dead, dying or hostile. There are bunkers and similar where people survived. Everybody not lucky enough to be in a bunker either evolved to live with the aftermath of the destruction or mutated.

Source: imdb
4. machines

- examples: Terminator, Matrix

- characteristics: In contrast to other post-apocalyptic wastelands that mostly lack electricity and anything that would need electricity due to the lack of power plants and the like, the wasteland of the machine-apocalypse is littered with active and working technology. Machines here are the enemy. There is a strict distinction between organic and artificial with organic being linked with good. Nature, here, is generally dead or dying as well. The possible thematic undercurrent is a criticism of humanity’s overreliance on technology.

Source: amazon

5. aliens

- examples: Falling Skies, The 5th Wave, A Quiet Place

- characteristics: Humans never had a chance. The extraterrestrials were more advanced and stronger and they won. Somehow, however, humans managed to survive like the cockroaches we are. For the future there are two options: either the humans succeed in their desperate attempt to turn this lost fight around or the earth is destroyed once and for all. This apocalypse, too, features more technology than others, brought by the alien invaders. Basically the only sub-genre of the post-apocalyptic movie where humans are completely free of blame.

I’m posting this now since it has been in my draft for so long that I don’t quite remember where I was going with this. So, now it is simply an enumeration of possible causes of apocalypses in media. If you have any additions, write me a message.

Satori over and out

About Me

My photo
I am in my early 30s and finished my university career. My areas of study included media analysis, literary and cultural studies, linguistics, and history. I like reading, drawing, writing, movies, TV, friends, traveling, dancing and all kinds of small things that make me happy. Just trying to spread some love.

Favorite quotes of 2025

This year, before I give you my rundown of best books read in 2025, I give you my favorite quotes in no particular order. These are just a s...